Check out our launch on Product Hunt today. Your support and feedback mean a lot to us!
We represent clients from all over the world before US state and federal courts, administrative tribunals, and arbitration institutions. Our litigation practice focuses on our core competencies, including mobile applications, intellectual property, cryptocurrency, corporate and cofounder disputes, and business agreements. We have experience in all stages of the process—from cease-and-desist letters to judgment enforcement.
Engaging in litigation, either as a plaintiff or a defendant, is often the last resort. Our approach is to analyze the case from the very outset and present clients with clear roadmaps and decision trees to help them make informed decisions about whether to proceed with litigation, attempt to settle the case, or pursue another course of action.
Once the optimal strategy is determined, we pursue it zealously but also with due regard to the efficient allocation of resources, focusing on the areas that are most likely to result in a favorable outcome for the client. This not only enhances the prospects of success but also helps in managing the costs of litigation.
We are not afraid to get our hands dirty and favor the use of open-source intelligence (OSINT) and private investigations in the development and enhancement of dispute resolution strategies.
Represent plaintiff mobile app developer in an action stemming from Apple’s termination of its App Store developer account, alleging breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, antitrust violations, and other related claims.
Represented plaintiff mobile app developer in an action challenging the removal of its application from Google Play after Meta’s complaint asserting violations of its trademark rights. Secured reinstatement of the app as part of a comprehensive settlement after moving for a temporary restraining order.
Read the case study >>Represent plaintiff in an action against a venture fund co-founder, seeking ratification of defendant co-founder’s removal from the fund and voidance of all acts he has undertaken since.
Prepared an expert opinion and delivered expert testimony on the application of US sanctions law to a dispute between large industrial enterprises being heard by an international arbitration tribunal.
Developed strategy and prepared a legal opinion on the reinstatement of app developer accounts on the App Store and Google Play.
Represent a leading crypto mining company against two entities for wrongful possession and unauthorized use of our client’s equipment. Secured the return of the most critical equipment to the client.
Represent a leading crypto mining company in recovering its multimillion-dollar mining equipment after it was rendered inaccessible due to a breach of agreement between the intermediary and the landlord.
Read the case study >>Represent the plaintiff company in a breach of contract action to recover $1.3 million in crypto funds. Won defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Represent defendant in a trademark opposition proceeding over rights to UNPLEX trademark.
Defend a career mentorship company in an action by a former client disputing the payment obligations he assumed under agreements with Careerist.
Represent one of the defendants in an arbitration matter where plaintiff has alleged violations of a non-disclosure and non-circumvention agreement.
Obtained a $1.4 million default judgment for a crypto venture capital fund in an action to recover funds invested through SAFTs in a game developer that failed to implement the project and squandered the invested funds.
Represent one of the largest European shipyards in a number of contractual disputes arising from the application of European sanctions.
Assisted Flipper Devices Inc., the developer of the popular multi-tool device for geeks, in recovering $1.3 million from a payment service provider.
Read the case study >>Secured a judgment for the plaintiff company in an unfair competition action enjoining foreign defendants from posting false information about Linked Helper and obtained a decision of a French court finding the judgment enforceable in France against defendant Waapi SAS.
Represented plaintiff in an action to recover funds from correspondent bank that it froze due to sanctions.
Represented petitioner in a trademark cancellation action alleging abandonment and fraud on the USPTO and coordinated strategy in several other jurisdictions in related disputes involving the same parties.
